Preface

Natural science development benefits humankind and has brought civilization and progress to the world. More than two thousand years of scientific development history recorded the great achievements of the science pioneers who made great contributions to human civilization. But it is regretful that the three big disputes including light velocity measuring dispute, electromagnetic induction dispute and time-space dispute are still beyond solution. More concerns have been made on the above disputes in the past hundreds years in order to further the science development to a high level.

In 1727，James assumed that while light transmits in ether medium at a constant velocity , the earth is just moving around the sun in the opposite direction and will result in deviation angle half a year later, and the deviation angle can be measured by star aberration light deviation experiment which verifies that the ether is not affected by earth rotation. In 1851, the fluid light velocity measurement experiment by Fizeau indicated that the light velocity had relations with transmission medium movement. But in 1881, Michelson-Morley held that light wave may make vibratory transmission in a static ether medium at a constant velocity , while the light source together with the earth may move at a velocity relative to ether medium, then the interference fringe resulted from wave-way difference can be detected, thereby the measurement result by interferometers is of zero nature. The above experiments were explained by Einstein that “Compared to the movement of the ether, some could be measurable and some immeasurable”, which resulted in the constant light velocity assumption that concealed the matter of light velocity nature: whether the light velocity is vector or scalar, whether the light velocity is absolute velocity or relative velocity and whether the light velocity is constant or superimposed?

In 1832, Faraday assumed the induction between magnet and conductor produced the induced electromotive force (e.m.f.) in the conductor. In 1834, Lentz considered the induction produced the induced current in the conductor. The above are all induced matters with different causal relation. In 1865, Maxwell assumed vortex electric-field (E-field) around free space during the magnet motion, which seemed to end the dispute of causal relation and yet it brought forward the question that the induction was produced in the conductor or in free space? In 1892, Lorentz created a metal electronic theory, for this reason the metal electron caused the induced current under Lorentz magnetic force, in which the nature is force instead of field. In essence, whether coil motion or magnet motion, as long as the relative movement remains between magnetic field and conductor, the metal electron will inevitably cut the magnetic line. The essence of electromagnetic induction could be consequently integrated with Lorentz magnetic force. In early twentieth century, relative electromagnetic theory arose that included electric field E and magnetic field B. So far, the unified theory on the electromagnetic induction nature has been not established. Which is nature, which is phenomenon? Which is reason? Which is result? Which is truth? Which is mistake? It is a great problem for all of us.

In 1905, Einstein\'s relative theory emphasized that “the absolute space is meaningless; the earth self-rotation causes little force difference. In Maxwell electric dynamics, the magnet motion causes induced electronic field in the space, and then the current in coil is generated whereas the current in coil is still generated when the coil motion does not produce induced electronic field in the space, so a conclusion was made that the space should not be symmetrical, ，James\'s experiment demonstrated the ether motion was measureable while in Michelson-Morley\'s experiment it was immeasurable, thus it could be assumed that the light velocity is unchangeable…” On the above analysis, Einstein deduced the special relative theory with Lorentz math transform. More and more obvious disadvantages from the special theory of relativity were revealed. Many college students doubted the theory in 1980s. In 1990s the scholars from China\'s Wuhan Institute of Surveying and Mapping, Geng Xianwen from Xi’an Microelectronics Research Institute and Huang Demin from National Navy made some studies on relative theory and pointed out that “the relative theory has mislead the physics astray in the future development”. Websites were also built to introduce some statements from some famous scientists opposing the relative theory. Not only has not the relative theory solve the two disputes, but also caused another dispute: is the time one-dimension or static? Is the space isotropic or compressible?

As to the three major disputes above, we must comprehensively inspect the great experiments in history from the concepts of nature and science, research the root cause of the “three major disputes”, seek the truth from the complex disputes, seize the physical concepts and find the physical nature in order to make the response of the holistic and unified natural attributes. It is a historical mission to scientific community as well as the great responsibilities endowed by the world 6.5 billion people.

The special relative theory was in fact based on unsymmetrical space from Maxwell’s vortex field theory in electromagnetic induction disputes and zero result from Michelson-Morley experiment in light velocity measurement disputes. Einstein assumed the light velocity was constant in order to interpret the great historical experiments with Lorentz transforms, but Einstein focused his intelligence on the math transform activities, and made mistakes in adopting math transform equation to interpret the physical nature.

Transform formulas of velocity was adopted to interpret the Fizeau experiment, the relativity’s Doppler Effect’ period = light motion time ＋ light wave transmission time was adopted to interpret James experiment, and electromagnetic induction was interpreted by electromagnetic field in eye. The above math transformation formulations are meaningless in real physical research without any persuasion. Huang Deming has pointed out that the relative theory disturbed people’s normal thought and had hampered people seeking the matter nature. This book summarized the natural science theory and great historical physical experiments, and completely analyzed the origin of three disputes. Correcting physical definitions and concept as well as persuasive evidences are powerful negation, from argument evidence to argument conclusion, to relative theory. This book contains ten chapters with content abstract as follows: