Chapter 6: Mistake of relative theory

Based on the particle velocity in microcosm, relativity theory shows that Newton’s law only differs by higher infinitesimal quantity from the relative theory. Newton’s law can be used for approximately calculation when the velocity is too small. This view misleads people to further study relative theory. The following aims at the analysis on the mistakes of relative theory.

Dynamics in relativity theory is absurd. From mechanic equation solving, it can be found that the solutions to these equations of simple harmonic movement, landing movement and parabolic movement result in the trace distorted, and also are not conformed to energy conservation; it is a huge deviation from actual reality. The satellite motion equation deduced by relative mechanics may result in trace distortion, which violates Kepler law, angular momentum conservation law and energy conservation. It can be alleged that Einstein’s gravitational theory is not applicable for satellite launch; the satellite may fall down from the “Riemann space”. But the Newton law is applicable and has been verified in all fields. If relative dynamics theory is adopted in the actual practice, accidents and disasters will be unpreventable. In the formula r~1, when v in ,B involves in calculus calculation, the motion equation will be changed into a variation function.

Mistake kinematics. A game player on a constant velocity (v) train (S’ coordination) is playing table ball, the relative velocity of the ball mass (m0) to the train is u\'x. Obviously these motions are momentum conservation P\'=P-P0 according to Galileo relativity theory, Newton’s law is another representation of F\'=F, the mass is conservative m=m0. But according to relative kinematics, due to m(no=)m\' and ux(no=)v＋u\'x, momentum P\' in S\' coordinate system is the high order function of c0 and u¢x, momentum P in S coordinate system is the high order function of c0, u¢x and . It is absurd that the momentum is nonconservation P(no=)P0 -P\' and the two measured forces in inertia coordinate system are unequal F\'(no=)F. Einstein had not defined static momentum and failed to find answer in static momentum.

But the static energy of the balls belongs to the static energy of coordinate system. Is it train coordinate system or ground coordinate system? Is it in solar system or Galaxy ？Is it relative or absolute? Since the relative theory has no absolute static space, no reference will result in any static energy. The ball total energy in dynamic coordinate system is m¢(c0)²，, whereas the ball total energy in static coordinate system is m(c0)². The formulas m(no=)m\' and ux(no=)v＋u\'x will result in m(c0)² (no=)m\'(c0)², then W(no=)W\' , P(no=)P0-P\' and m(no=)m\' as well as F\'(no=)F. All the kinematic parameters are not certain in the two inertia coordinate system. After deduced by relative kinematics, the basic motion is neither of Newton law changing nor unchanged relative theory in Lorentz changing. So what is the relative kinematics? A mistake is only to say.

Absurd electromagnetism. The relative electromagnetism assumes not the timing magnetic field creates the electric field but magnetic field and electric field are observed by the viewer making relative motion. The assumed unsymmetrical space theory, based on the Maxwell curling filed, deviates from its electromagnetic theory. We can deduce from velocity selector, particle accelerator that the relative electromagnetism is deviated from modern particle experiments, even the deviation is two times by actual value. Distortion equations would arise if the relative electromagnetism is applied for designing the betatron generator. We should also be reminded that relative theory has no definition of absolute coordinate system, the theory only covers the selected coordinate system, and also only covers relative velocity but absolute velocity, so v in ,B is the relative velocity. But actual experiment indicated that the relative velocity between the two high-velocity electric charges is great larger than c0, i.e. ,B>1, so the repulsive force deduced by relative electromagnetic theory between two electric chargers is imaginary value. The radioactive velocity in either linear electric field or linear magnetic field is c0, the electric chargers are radiated by the electric field, and the relative velocity between the electric field and the radiated charges is equal to c0, that is, b=1. The above deduction has been verified in practice. Consequently, the acting force deduced by relative electromagnetism is infinite large. These evidences can come to a conclusion that the electromagnetism is a mistake.

Mistake time-space view. The slowing clock under inertia centrifugal force at equator line is unavoidable; the clock speed is caused by the accelerated velocity but the constant linear motion. Clock is a manual measurement attribute which is determined by measuring tool and application condition, while time is a nature attribute. In this chapter, several instances are cited as the mistake time-space view by relative theory as well as the mistake interpretation of twins’ single flying event. Each of the twins is flying in reverse directions, carrying the same clocks and same rulers. The relative theory has only the selected coordination but the absolute coordinate system, then L=L\'/r and ot=ot\'.r will indicate no difference between approaching and departing, the same turning accelerating field will result in the contradictory answers when the twins meet again. The length shrinking view and time expanding view are the representations of the mistake time-space view which is beyond Einstein’s interpretations.

Mistake constant light velocity hypothesis. light motion is a focus and sensitive item in relative theory, Einstein had never given a clear interpretation about whether light velocity is an absolute velocity or a relative velocity. If the answer is relative velocity conforming to velocity superposition theory, then the measured relative velocity by movers is c=c0＋v, which is inconsistent with constant light velocity hypothesis. If the answer is an absolute velocity, all the motions relative to light are relative motions, which is also inconsistent with relative theory. So Einstein gave no answer to this question and made a constant light velocity hypothesis. Einstein had never given a clear interpretation about nature of the light motion. If the light motion is radiation, the light velocity is just the same as radioactive ray stream, which is the launching velocity relative to the light source. When the light source is moving, the relative velocity by measure-worker is c=c0＋v , which is inconsistent with constant light velocity hypothesis. If the light motion is transmission motion, then there must be necessary transmission medium just as mechanical wave, which is beyond verification. So Einstein gave no answer and made constant light velocity hypothesis. Einstein had never interpreted whether the light velocity is a vector or a scalar. Actually the laser bomb and laser bundle are vectors, then vector c0and vector v will be conformed to vector superposition principle. A laser gun in flying module is firing outside the window, people in the module can only observe the firing velocity uy=c0, but people outside the module can feel not only the longitudinal velocity uy=c0 but also the transverse velocity ux=v, so c=c0＋v is deduced according to vector superposition principle, so Einstein mainly focused on the light velocity inside the module, but had no interpretations about outside light velocity. Now it comes to the light velocity of a moving light source with sphere face wave in the relative theory-Lorentz transformation. It is obvious that u\'x=u\'y=u\'z=c0 is available in S\' coordinate system, the relative resultant velocity in S coordinate system is uy=uz<c0 when the light source is moving along x direction, which is inconsistent with his constant light velocity hypothesis. When the light source is moving along x negative direction at (-v) velocity, the resultant velocity is uy=uz>c0, which does not meet constant light velocity hypothesis. So the relative theory is a self-contradiction and a mistake.

From the historical events and developments, it could be clearly found that ether theory was dominant at that certain period, the curl theory interpreted the electric displacement in ether medium, and the Lorentz change was made for explaining the interference experiment of immeasurable motion that was also consistent with ether theory. Einstein summarized the above theories and interpreted his relative theory. Einstein mostly emphasized on the ether definition and measurable motion or immeasurable motion dispute, he made a mistake to adopt ether view to interpret the relative theory, which mislead Einstein himself and all of us. The Maxwell curling theory based on ether theory and the Lorentz transform based on ether theory together resulted in Einstein’s relative theory in ether medium. The ether theory precipitated relative theory and also misled Einstein’s researches. Since the special principle of relativity is absurd, the general relative theory is meaningless.

The conclusions in this chapter are that relative theory is a mistake; Newton law and Galileo relativity principle are truths. [the mathematics formula seeing picture in HOME]